logo

Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate

Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.





Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.


back

Copyright and Incentives

Andrew Sullivan takes note of the copyright debate between Matthew Yglesias and Sonny Bunch (is that his real name?) here:

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/02/copyright-and-incentives.html#more


Comments

Matt failed to quote the constitutional provision to the effect that "Congress shall have the power to promote the progress of Science and useful Arts...." It does not require the Congress to do so, a fact that seems to be seldom noticed.
I must quote one of the commenters here:

sidereal:

Your purported justification, though... "The purpose of intellectual property law is to punish people who steal that which isn't theirs." is just tautological nonsense (the purpose of a law is to punish people who break it?)
While it's true that the "progress clause" doesn't require America's only native criminal class--that would be Congress--to do anything, if we combine Rothbard's Law (the fact that governments seek to use whatever power they have) with rent seeking by the morally lower elements of life, and add a dash of public choice, then mix well and throw the resulting stew against the wall, we have pretty much our current intellectual monopoly monstrosity.

Submit Comment

Blog Post

Name:

Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code
UnoSixQuatroEight:


Post



   

Most Recent Comments

A Texas Tale of Intellectual Property Litigation (A Watering Hole Patent Trolls) Aunque suena insignificante, los números son alarmantes y nos demuestran que no es tan mínimo como

James Boyle's new book with his congenial IP views free to download

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1

French firm has patents on using computers to choose medical treatment 1