Thomson Reuters, maker of the EndNote bibliographic software, is suing George Mason University and the State of Virginia, see Courthouse News
). The issue is Zotero, an open source bibliographic tool that appears to rapidly increase its market share, as it is much lighter, platform independent, browser plugable and free. Of course, this is not the official reason, Thomson Reuters rather argues that Zotero developers reversed engineered EndNote to allow Zotero to import EndNote files.
This is a very serious issue for Thomson Reuters. Indeed, its clientele is essentially locked in, as researchers have built their bibliographic databases over the years and cannot export them. With Zotero this is suddenly possible, and they can drop EndNote for another product, including the free Zotero. Thomson Reuters must be especially annoyed as its product has become less and less practical, from what I hear, and very bloated. But customers had no choice but buy new versions. Reminds me of Microsoft products, on which EndNote relies heavily.
[Posted at 09/27/2008 07:13 PM by Christian Zimmermann on Software comments(14)]
The good news in this is that open source software is not so easy to suppress. Even if they win, there will be many copies around, researchers can rescue their bibliographies into an open format, and software that uses the open format will be unproblematic as long as it doesn't do the conversion.
[Comment at 09/27/2008 09:16 PM by David K. Levine]
This has been a long standing irritant with me. Companies, while they have a right to have a proprietary product, do not have a right to stop someone from accessing/utilizing the data.
Do Cars Get An Anti-Circumvention Exemption?
StorageTek's Maintenance Code
Court Slaps Down Lexmark For DMCA Misuse
Mike Masnick wrote,in regards to Lexmark => "The court clearly understood the larger issues: "If we were to adopt Lexmark's reading of the statute, manufacturers could potentially create monopolies for replacement parts simply by using similar, but more creative, lock-out codes. Automobile manufacturers, for example, could control the entire market of replacement parts for their vehicles by including lock-out chips. Congress did not intend to allow the DMCA to be used offensively in this manner, but rather only sought to reach those who circumvented protective measures "for the purpose" of pirating works protected by the copyright statute.""
Not quite on-topic, but still an abuse of technology.
Man files antitrust lawsuit over printer ink
[Comment at 09/28/2008 09:41 AM by Steve R.]
The suit by Thomson Reuters appears absurd, without knowing additional information. Even if their software is patented, data is data, 1's and 0's, and a program built to access 1's and 0's would seem to me to find difficulty in infringing software.
As I have pointed out repeatedly, one option for companies to protect their business is to be more clever about how they encode data and the secrets they keep. However, reverse engineering, as long as it does not violate a valid patent, is perfectly legal and, in fact, would be considered a desirable outcome by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
I believe strongly in intellectual property, but not in the repeated abuse of intellectual property laws by individuals and corporations.
[Comment at 09/28/2008 05:10 PM by Lonnie E. Holder]
Aha! Lonnie, you've taken the first step, which is admitting that there is a problem.
Now all you need to realize is that all so-called "intellectual property laws" are abusive by their very nature, and that artificially forcing the price of a 3 cent CD full of zero-cent 1s and 0s to $15 is abusive, and Bob's your uncle.
[Comment at 10/03/2008 10:27 PM by None of your beeswax]
I think that it is controversial question professional resume
[Comment at 10/31/2010 04:25 PM by Caroline]
This is a nice post in an interesting line of content.
Thanks for sharing this article, great way of bring this topic to discussion.
Keep up the excellent work !
[Comment at 11/04/2010 04:20 PM by Anonymous]
[Comment at 11/10/2010 01:47 AM by dress]
[Comment at 11/10/2010 01:49 AM by dress]
This is a great inspiring article.I am pretty much pleased with your good work.You put really very helpful information. Keep it up. Keep blogging. Looking to reading your next post.
Ruby @ Mobile Spy Software
[Comment at 11/25/2010 12:37 AM by Ruby]
Considerably, the article is in reality the greatest on this noteworthy topic. I agree with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your next updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the wonderful clarity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Pleasant work and much success in your business dealings! accredited degree
AND online degree
AND prior learning degree
[Comment at 11/25/2010 10:26 PM by Anonymous]
I admire the valuable information you offer in your blog. The picture looks very nice. And I will bookmark your post and have my visitors check up here often life experience degree
AND college degree
[Comment at 11/25/2010 10:27 PM by Anonymous]
The post is written in very a good manner and it entails many useful information for me. I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement the concept. Thank you for the post
Orange County Real Estate
[Comment at 12/06/2010 11:53 PM by Orange County Real Estate]
Nobody here cares about Orange County real-estate, you twit. Nobody here is going to click on your stupid link. Nobody here is going to buy any Orange County real-estate from your stupid website.
Your ads are not only unwelcome here; they are also ineffective here.
So quit posting them, douchebags!
[Comment at 12/07/2010 12:02 AM by Suzzle]
Don't be ridiculous. Reverse engineering for interoperability is explicitly (as in, written in the law somewhere) fair use.
[Comment at 12/29/2010 09:08 AM by Nobody Nowhere]