Against Monopoly

defending the right to innovate


Monopoly corrupts. Absolute monopoly corrupts absolutely.

Copyright Notice: We don't think much of copyright, so you can do what you want with the content on this blog. Of course we are hungry for publicity, so we would be pleased if you avoided plagiarism and gave us credit for what we have written. We encourage you not to impose copyright restrictions on your "derivative" works, but we won't try to stop you. For the legally or statist minded, you can consider yourself subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License.

current posts | more recent posts



"a lawyer gone bad"?

Remember that lawyers do not actually exist on the 'good-bad' spectrum as we know it.

A lawyer is judged by how well they understand and apply the law and use this to represent their clients.

For example, in this case, TASER® International Files Litigation Against Stinger Systems, Inc. for False Advertising and Unlawful Patent Marking, can there be a 'good' lawyer representing either manufacturer?

How do you know that those lawyers weren't representing Amnesty International in previous cases?

I think you'll find that good lawyers have their ethics surgically removed just after passing the bar exams as they otherwise interfere with their concentration.

The good or bad people are those the lawyers are representing. Look to them to see who have grace and who have fallen.

Who more likely took SCO upon a fool's errand? Darl McBride or David Boies?

It wasn't a fool's errand for David Boies who walked away a rich man courtesy of some not so bright investors; I think Darl McBride did the same.
I think we agree that SCO (company and gullible shareholders) constitutes the fool taken upon a foolish errand.

We agree that someone played SCO's 'not so bright investors' for fools by doing so, and obtained the handsome rewards any confidence trickster would be proud of.

However, just because legal expertise is financed by such rewards shouldn't lead one to conclude that the lawyer is instigating the con, or even tainted by their client's dishonorable intent and unscrupulous methods.

It could be compared to the situation where doctors perfect their professionally necessary emotional detachment to such an extent that they descend into physiologists and find themselves migrating from attending to the health of prisoners, to attending to the needs of their 'interrogators'.

We may wring our hands that people can subvert their own humanity in pursuit of their profession, but we should 'follow the money' if we want to find the bad actors, rather than the grievously neutral.

Thus commerce is culpable for copyright, not the angelic author its arrangement is attributed to.

If we could persuade legislators to put ethics before economics, and lawyers to put citizen before corporate client, then we wouldn't have copyright.

Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending upon your situation), lawyers put their clients first, and legislators put commerce before civil rights.

And so we get Regal Cinemas (and their CEOs, the shareholders' sociopathic servants) prosecuting their customers for enjoying cultural freedom.

All the professionals involved are doing their job, looking after their shareholders, upholding the law, and absolving themselves of any culpability.

And it's very easy for those who read such news to condemn a criminal rather than confront corruption that ultimately only they can cure.

current posts | more recent posts

Submit Comment

Blog Post


Email (optional):

Your Humanity:

Prove you are human by retyping the anti-spam code.
For example if the code is unodosthreefour,
type 1234 in the textbox below.

Anti-spam Code



Most Recent Comments

Some history

Killing people with patents SYSSY

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy rerwerwerwer

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy Thank you for this great

Questions and Challenges For Defenders of the Current Copyright Regime Eu acho que os direitos autorais da invenção ou projeto devem ser

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy https://essaywritingsolutions.co.uk/

Your Compulsory Assignment for Tonight rerrerrr

IIPA thinks open source equals piracy rwerwewre

An analysis of patent trolls by a trademark lawyer

Questions and Challenges For Defenders of the Current Copyright Regime It is one of the finest websites I have stumbled upon. It is not only well developed, but has good

Killing people with patents I'm not really commenting the post, but rather asking if this blog is going to make a comeback

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges Finally got around to looking at the comments, sorry for delay... Replying to Stephan: I'm sorry

Let's See: Pallas, Pan, Patents, Persephone, Perses, Poseidon, Prometheus... Seems like a kinda bizarre proposal to me. We just need to abolish the patent system, not replace

The right to rub smooth using a hardened steel tool with ridges I'm a bit confused by this--even if "hired to invent" went away, that would just change the default

Do we need a law? @ Alexander Baker: So basically, if I copy parts of 'Titus Andronicus' to a webpage without

Do we need a law? The issue is whether the crime is punished not who punishes it. If somebody robs our house we do

Do we need a law? 1. Plagiarism most certainly is illegal, it is called "copyright infringement". One very famous

Yet another proof of the inutility of copyright. The 9/11 Commission report cost $15,000,000 to produce, not counting the salaries of the authors.

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece P.S. The link to Amazon's WKRP product page:

WKRP In Cincinnati - Requiem For A Masterpiece Hopefully some very good news. Shout! Factory is releasing the entire series of WKRP in Cincinnati,